Mordaunt Hall, critic for the New York Times, famously wrote Brooks is attractive and she moves her head and eyes at the proper moment, but whether she is endeavoring to express joy, woe, anger or satisfaction it is often difficult to decide. Quinn Martin, critic at the New York World, echoed Hall remarks when he stated does occur to me that Miss Brooks, while one of the handsomest of all the screen girls I have seen, is still one of the most eloquently terrible actresses who ever looked a camera in the eye. put the nail in the coffin when its critic opined for Louise Brooks had she contented exhibiting that supple form in tworeel comedies or Paramount features. Pandora Box, a rambling thing that doesn help her, nevertheless proves that Miss Brooks is not a dramatic lead. is it that draws contemporary audiences to Louise Brooks? And why would 2,000 people gather to see a once disregarded 80 year old silent film?
 <a href="" title="Michael Kors Watches">Michael Kors Watches</a>

トップ   新規 一覧 検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS
Site admin: PukiWiki Development Team

PukiWiki 1.5.3+ © 2001-2020 PukiWiki Development Team. Powered by PHP 5.6.40-0+deb8u12. HTML convert time: 0.079 sec.